Polygon Vs Solana: Which Crypto Is Better In 2023

What Are The Differences

A few key differences between the two ecosystem types make it difficult to decide which one is right for you. Polygon is a website that focuses on digital art and design, while Solana is a website focused on nature and ecology. Are there any big differences between Polygon Vs Solana? Please refer to the article below with Covemarkets.

What Is a Crypto Ecosystem?

The blockchain ecosystem is a group of users collaborating on business goals and procedures.

Blockchains have gained popularity since bitcoin introduced money. No new technology has ever developed so swiftly. Data in a blockchain can’t be altered or hacked. Today, decentralized businesses use blockchain’s strengths.

What is Polygon (MATIC)?

A blockchain called Polygon (MATIC) was created with developers in mind to address some of the most pressing problems they are now facing. The protocol was created to serve as Ethereum’s “Internet of Blockchains eventually.” Early on, the creators anticipated that there would be thousands of Ethereum-based blockchains active in the market.

What is Solana (SOL)?

Solana, a third-generation blockchain, supports DeFi. The open, secure network infrastructure is fast. Protocol creators prioritized scalability. The project aimed to streamline blockchain development and eliminate Ethereum bottlenecks.

Solana was founded after Anatoly Yakovenko’s 2017 crypto breakthrough. This year, Ethereum and Bitcoin encountered terrible congestion that stopped both networks. These situations motivated Yakovenko and his colleagues. Greg Fitzgerald and Eric Williams are crucial team members, per process.

Advantages vs. Disadvantages


Pros Cons
  • Polygon is made more secure by the location of the validation system.
  • The challenges that MATIC is currently addressing may be resolved by the development taking place to bring about ETH2.0.
  • The Polygon blockchain, which can handle up to 72,000 transactions per second, was designed to address the scalability problem.
  • The MATIC blockchain offers a similar user experience to Ethereum.


Pros Cons
  • The blockchain has a stateless architecture, which gives developers more freedom to use it however they see fit.
  • The Solana blockchain requires more expensive hardware support than others.
  • A high-performance protocol is incorporated into SOL, aiding the blockchain’s scalability.
  • SOL’s decentralization is insufficient.
  • Extremely fast transactional rate. It is capable of handling 65,000 transactions per second.

What Do They Have in Common?

What Do They Have in Common?
What Do They Have in Common?

Polygon and Solana are both decentralized finance protocols built on Ethereum. They share many similarities, such as trading various assets, providing liquidity to DeFi protocols, and offering staking opportunities. However, there are also some key differences between the two platforms.

For example, Polygon uses a layer 2 scaling solution, while Solana uses its native blockchain. Additionally, Solana focuses on speed and scalability, while Polygon offers a more comprehensive suite of features.

Polygon vs Solana: What Are The Differences Between 2 Ecosystems?


Polygon employs multiple technologies to create a fast blockchain network and link to Ethereum. Proof of Stake secures the blockchain network and generates fresh MATIC tokens. Staking on Polygon can earn you MATIC tokens.

Solana’s consensus algorithm is unique. The network utilizes an array or calculations to choose the optimum time difference confirmation method. Solana utilizes a cryptographically secure method to forecast output. The blockchain platform uses a hybrid consensus approach that combines Proof of Stake with Proof of History. Solana’s hybrid consensus allows for more flexible transaction structuring. The blockchain’s consensus technique processes over 50,000 transactions every second.

Programming language


All of the smart contracts on Polygon are written in Solidity, just like Ethereum. Because Polygon is EVM compatible, any developer who has previously created software for Ethereum can do so.

Everything launched on ETH may be deployed on MATIC because both use the same language and syntax. Any Defi wallet that supports ETH should work with MATIC due to its EVM compatibility. Metamask is the finest example, although most ETH-compatible wallets allow switching to Polygon mainnet chain.


On the other side, Solana is not at all EMV-compatible. Programming-wise, Rust is great since it consumes less memory than Solidity, the language that Solana developers use.

Technically, there are more Rust developers than Solidity developers because Rust is a programming language that is significantly older than Solidity.

However, developers of Solana intelligent contracts are thought to be harder to come by than those of Solidity. Finding a web3.0 developer can be difficult because the field is so young, and few capable developers are available.

The final thing to remember with Solana is that because it is not EVM-compatible, most users open a brand-new Defi wallet to use it.




Solana’s TPS is above 2,000, which is faster than other blockchains. After reaching 400,000 TPS, Solana’s mainnet beta was shut down in September 2021. After the event, solutions were presented. Investors expect this won’t happen again because it shows the ecosystem’s growing potential.

Since Solana’s blockchain is new, it hasn’t attained its full potential. The Solana ecosystem will significantly influence the cryptocurrency industry’s growth in 2021. Solana and its projects are both successful in the bitcoin market.


This quick parallel blockchain is built by Polygon using various technologies and is connected to the main Ethereum blockchain.

Polygon uses a proof-of-stake consensus process, which means that one way you may make money on MATIC you own is by staking. This mechanism is used to create a new MATIC and protect the network.

  • Validators review and add new transactions to the blockchain. They may get a share of the fees and MATIC in return. Validators must run a full-time node and stake MATIC. If you make a mistake or act maliciously, you can lose MATIC (or even if your internet connection is unreliable).
  • Through a dependable validator, delegators indirectly stake their MATIC. This is a far less severe form of staking. But the investigation is still necessary because you risk losing some or all of your staked MATIC if the validator you choose commits fraud or mistakes.



Decentralization includes validator nodes. The Solana Foundation creates blockchain core nodes. Solana’s concentrated control reduces the network’s decentralization. Ethereum node developers Go Ethereum, OpenEthereum, Nevermind, and Besu.

Solana is not the only company with just one core node developer. On the framework created by a single entity, several other Layer 1 chains operate. For instance, Ava Labs is the sole developer of the core node for Avalanche.


Polygon is a decentralized platform based on Ethereum. It serves as a framework for creating and expanding Ethereum applications. Scalability, security, and development tools are all aspects of the full-stack solution for Ethereum that Polygon seeks to offer.

For Ethereum applications, Polygon offers security solutions. Some solutions include a decentralized exchange, a safe multi-party computation protocol, and a decentralized identity management system.




A bug stopped Solana blockchain creation at 16:55 UTC on June 1, 2023. After nearly four and a half hours, validator operators resumed the mainnet at 21:00 UTC.

Anatoly Yalovenko, the co-founder of Solana, later explained on Twitter that a bug allowed nodes to offer various outputs, leading to a consensus breakdown. Some networks felt the block was wrong due to the long-lasting nonce instruction. Hence no transactions could be made.

Solana, an “Ethereum killer,” experienced two DDoS-related failures in September 2021, leading to a problematic price patch and investor discontent.

A new NFT initiative began on April 30, overloading Solana with 6 million transactions per second. Metaplex, the authors of Solana’s NFT protocol, have implemented a “bot tax” penalty.

Solana’s blockchain timekeeping is similarly slow, 30 minutes off. Due to longer-than-normal block durations, on-chain time lags behind wall clocks.


Polygon PoS chain comprises two main components. Heimdall chain is the tendermint-based proof-of-stake verifier layer. And Bor chain is the geth-based block producer layer.

The Heimdall chain had an issue with the state-sync mechanism. In an attempt to fix it, the sequence of software releases and a second bug resulted in both services going offline. Over the course of several days, the team released multiple updates and worked closely with all the stakeholders in a coordinated rollout of the changes. There was no loss of user funds or data.

Transaction cost (Gas fees)


The time needed to construct new blocks on the blockchain and the maximum amount of transactions that a single block may accommodate affect transaction fees, which vary between coins. Solana has a more favorable block time (0.4 seconds).

The Solana network has an exceptionally cheap transaction cost of just $0.00025 per transaction because of the longer block times and larger blocks. Considering this cost, Solana is among the blockchains with the lowest transaction fees.

With such figures, Solana ought to have no trouble exceeding 50,000 TPS. According to bitcoin.com, that is roughly comparable to what VISA can do.

Solana is expanding quickly and promises to quadruple its scalability every two years in terms of CPU and other technologies. If the network can do this, block-space competition will decrease, keeping transaction fees low and possibly even falling.


Following the easy interoperability with Ethereum made possible by its bridge, the Polygon Matic project skyrocketed in popularity. The scaling protocol has scaled the Ethereum network by making it a multi-chain. Along with lowering the Ethereum gas fee, Polygon Matic also gained popularity in cryptocurrency.

The Polygon Matic network’s gas fee typically ranges from $0.0005 to $0.2, increasing.

Transaction speed

Transaction speed
Transaction speed

One of the key considerations for a developer choosing the platform they should work on is the speed of transactions on a blockchain network. Solana and Polygon are much ahead in terms of transaction speeds and provide far quicker rates of 50,000–65,00 transactions per second than others.

Tower Byzantine Fault Tolerance (TBFT), which prevents real-time communication between nodes and shortens the processing time, is a key component of Solana. Contrarily, Polygon moves at the fastest speed. With 65,000 transactions per second, it has the highest transaction speed since it offers a hybrid environment.

Network size


The Solana network is composed of many validators, each running a full node. The network size can be measured by the number of connected validators. As of June 2020, there are over 300 validators on the Solana network.


Polygon has a total of 100 validators with 100 nodes on each of them.


Scalability has been discussed extensively, so let’s go further.

  • Polygon and Solana use proof-of-stake (PoS) systems, which allow nodes to stake MATIC and SOL to authenticate transactions while retaining decentralization. These bettors win cryptocurrency if they choose well; else, they lose (losing a portion of their holdings).
  • Polygon and Solana use proof-of-stake (PoS) mechanisms to verify transactions while remaining decentralized. Network nodes stake their individual MATIC and SOL holdings. If they choose properly, they get bitcoins; if not, they pay a fee (losing a portion of their holdings).
  • Solana executes 1,700 transactions per second vs. 50 for Polygon. They vary daily. This is partly owing to Solana’s use of Proof of History, a technology that arranges transactions to speed them up. In the future, Polygon may process transactions faster than Solana.

Market cap

  • Solana (SOL): With a live market cap of $12,520,919,35, CoinMarketCap is now ranked #9.
  • Polygon (MATIC): With a live market cap of $6,469,983,88, the current CoinMarketCap ranking is 14.

DeFi ecosystem

DeFi ecosystem
DeFi ecosystem


  • Serum: The non-custodial DEX (decentralized exchange) in the Solana ecosystem is called Serum and is renowned for its quick order processing. Serum’s unique matching engine, which enables it to run an entire ecosystem of connected exchanges, is decentralized and extremely scalable.
  • Raydium: An automated market maker, or AMM, is Raydium, and it serves as the ecosystem’s exchange’s on-chain liquidity provider for Serum.
  • Mango Markets: An open-source trading, borrowing, and lending platform called Mango Markets is geared toward improving capital efficiency. It provides the first fully on-chain perpetual futures order book and spot margin trading based on Serum. The Solana ecosystem’s Mango gives the lowest prices.


One of the biggest ecosystems on the market is that of Polygon Matic DeFi. This is demonstrated by the DeFi Llama data, where the Polygon Matic TVL was $2.32 billion after falling 8.81%. According to the figures, Polygon TVL was worth $10 billion a year ago.

After scaling the chain, the Polygon Matic DeFi ecosystem consumed a significant amount of Ethereum DeFi, but performance has declined. The Polygon Matic Defi is still expanding, as more fresh DeFi initiatives and goods join the network.

The performance of the Ethereum blockchain will determine whether the growth of the Polygon Matic DeFi ecosystem will continue to be rapid. Things could get more difficult for the Polygon Matic network if the Ethereum chain improves and surpasses it.




When minting NFTs on Solana, the asset will become a standard Solana Program Library Token, making it very easy to be deployed and transfer without writing intelligent contracts from scratch and with fewer computational resources. For novice NFT creators, it is a very developer-friendly and cheap blockchain alternative.

However, some users may find combining the NFTs in one collection challenging. While the usual procedure is to ask the creator for a casting list, the most effective way to create a collection on Solana is far more technical, involving using one token to represent an entire collection.


The OpenSea marketplace is required for users to profit on Polygon. One of the biggest decentralized NFT marketplaces is OpenSea, which has a simple user interface and a vast user base. Nevertheless, to avoid scammers, it is still crucial to double-check the offers and transactions.

Ethereum is still frequently preferred over Polygon by NFT buyers due to its popularity, even though lower costs can increase client demand. Therefore, even if the network offers about six months of free auctioning time, the NFT’s developer may still need to invest in a strong marketing plan to sell the NFT more quickly.

At a Glance

Name Solana Polygon
Launch Date 2017 2017
Founder Anatoly Yakovenko and  Greg Fitzgerald Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwal, and Anurag Arjun
Blockchain Protocol Solana Protocol Ethereum Blockchain (ERC20 token)
Native Token SOL MATIC
Token Type Altcoin ERC-20
Market Cap $15,461,085,344 $7,205,508,242
Circulating Supply 345,608,494.95 SOL 8.01B MATIC
Max Supply NA 10,000,000,000
Consensus Method Proof of History (PoH) Plasma Framework + Proof-of-stake (PoS)
Architecture Stateless architecture Multichain architecture
Scalability High-Performance protocol for scalability Multichain solutions offer better scalability
Transaction Speed 65,000 TPS 72,000 TPS

Future Projections

On Polygon

In 2021, Polygon established Polygon Studios as a division with a focus on blockchain gaming and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

If successful, Polygon Studios might position Polygon as a top technology supplier for decentralized gaming and NFTs.

Polygon hired a new chief executive officer in January 2023. (CEO). Ryan Watts has moved from YouTube, where he served as the head of gaming, to Polygon.

On Solana

More good news about the ecosystem has also been revealed, such as the debut of Breakpoint, the Solana Foundation’s inaugural conference honoring local successes. The four-day event, which begins on November 7, 2021, will likely feature significant revelations about the Solana ecosystem’s future.

As Ethereum suffers from high gas costs and network congestion, more projects are using Solana’s inexpensive protocol. The PoS system of the beacon chain will combine with the Ethereum mainnet in 2023. Therefore, ETH 2.0 will still be far from fixing the network’s problems. The Solana ecosystem has the potential to grow its market share and become one of the leading smart-contract platforms of the future in the meantime.

MATIC vs SOL – Which Is a Better Investment?

Which Is a Better Investment?
Which Is a Better Investment?

There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on each investor’s individual goals and preferences. However, some key considerations that may influence your decision include the following:

  • Solana is a more established project with a longer track record. At the same time, Polygon is a newer project still in its early stages of development.
  • Solana is focused on providing a high-performance blockchain platform, while Polygon is focused on scaling Ethereum through sidechains.
  • Solana has a more diverse range of use cases, while Polygon primarily focuses on DeFi applications.
  • Solana is backed by a larger and more well-known team of developers, while Polygon has a smaller team of relatively unknown developers.
  • Solana is traded on more exchanges and has a higher market capitalization, while Polygon is traded on fewer exchanges and has a lower market capitalization.

Where to buy MATIC and SOL?


The MATIC and SOL tokens enjoy high liquidity and are now among the top 100 largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. Many cryptocurrency exchanges, including top-tier ones like Coinbase Pro, Binance, Huobi Global, and Poloniex as well as the well-known decentralized exchange Uniswap, offer it for purchase and trading.


All significant cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance, Kucoin, Huobi Global, Gate.io, and Kraken, offer SOL token.



Which one should I choose?

There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on each individual’s needs and preferences. Some people may prefer Solana because it offers a more scalable and faster platform.

In contrast, others may prefer Polygon because it is more user-friendly and has a more robust security model. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to decide which platform is best for them.

Which one is the best ecosystem?

There is no best ecosystem, as each has its advantages and disadvantages. Solana may be more suited for large-scale projects, while Polygon may be more suitable for smaller projects.

Is Polygon more secure than Solana?

Both Polygon and Solana have their unique security features. Some experts believe that Polygon may be more secure than Solana due to its use of multiple Ethereum virtual machines (EVMs), which offer increased protection against attacks.

Which is more advanced?

Both projects are constantly evolving and improving. However, Polygon may be slightly more advanced as it offers more features and functionality than Solana.

Is Polygon or Solana more popular?

Two of the most well-known Layer 1 and 2 crypto networks, Solana and Polygon (MATIC), have thousands of daily users each.

Due to their competitive transaction fees, both systems are preferred over other networks like Ethereum, Avalanche, and Optimism/Arbitrum.

Why are they so popular?

There are a few reasons why Polygon and Solana are popular. First, they both offer low transaction fees. This is important because users can save money on their transactions. Second, they both offer high speed and scalability.

This is important because it means that users can transact quickly without worrying about congestion or slowdowns. Finally, they both have a strong community backing them. This is important because it supports users and helps ensure the platforms remain stable and secure.

Where can I learn more about them?

The official Polygon website is the best place to learn more about the project. The Solana website is also an excellent resource for learning more about the project.


There are many differences between Polygon and Solana blockchain platforms. Polygon is more centralized, while Solana is more decentralized. Polygon is more complex, while Solana is simpler. Polygon is more expensive, while Solana is cheaper. Polygon has a larger user base, while Solana has a smaller one. Polygon is more developed, while Solana is not as developed.